Hacker News Reader

There is no reason for anyone to touch any of this with a ten foot pole, let alone do free work for you. Laughable.

Typically the burden of proof would be on the one making the assertion that something is malicious, but I see mere accusations and paranoia is good enough for some people even with the code right in front of them. Two unused string constants doesn't mean much.

It very much does when someone else already pointed out that the same code has previously been show to include malware.

>that the same code has previously been show to include malware.

What was pointed out was, that the extension got compromised at our thereafter December 2024. The version I base this on was sourced from the Web Store August 2024 when it was a legit Chrome and Firefox extension with active 300,000+ users and existed since since 2020. Just because an extension gets compromised you think that retroactively means the old versions are unsafe too and now the code is haunted?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com