What We Lose When We're Priced Out of Our Hobbies
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
Anecdotally, I can shoot trap with an inexpensive shotgun ($300 or so) and fish for salmon with a similar rod and reel. I'm spending far more in ongoing costs in trips on fuel, food, and a thousand little comforts with my buddies than the initial investment. At the same time, I routinely see $5000+ (and sometimes twice that) in fine trap guns at the range, rifles that cost that alone with an equally expensive optic, and see how much money is in the guided hunt/fish business. There are whales that distort the top end of the market, but the low end has objectively never been of higher quality for the same dollars.
At the same time, I was thinking: what if the spenders in these markets just have more money?
Here's a quick report that suggests the 35-65 group where the money is is popular : https://asafishing.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024_ASA_E...
Rec shooting says something similar, with the 100k+ income bracket the largest: https://fishwildlife.org/mscgp/application/files/2316/8691/8...
Casually, and without a good source of historical data, what if we just have the money to play? To what degree this article becomes merely about inflation than gentrification is debatable, imo.
Idk, that one i find hard to square.
One of the things that's hard to nail down from the article's thesis is what really costs people? Initial or ongoing costs?
Not unlike what I was saying with the top end of the fishing or shooting markets skewing what 'average' looks like, consider two things I found here:
More than half of gaming revenue is microtransactions: https://insider-gaming.com/58-of-pc-gaming-revenue-came-from...
About 10% of microtransaction customers bring in the biggest share of revenue: https://www.chriskempt.com/p/how-much-do-whales-spend
I think thrifty Switch gamers and weekend warrior beginner trap shooters are both little affordable niches in the bigger landscape of the hobby, and it's hard to know what really constitutes typical.
Too bad I am also not a subscriber; now I won't find the really expensive ways to knit. Do you need a golden thread?
My wife sews, and she has a small yarn collection as well, but never really got into knitting or crochet. I nearly had to contain my laughter when my mother told me that it would save us lots of money.
Sure. It costs more in fabric to make a shirt than to buy a shirt, and that’s not getting into machines. Look at us save!
Hobbies are for fun. Making things for yourself is, more often than not, crazy expensive.
Nowhere does the author speculate that possibly, this is because the hobbies have gotten more popular and possibly more people are knitting or perhaps they're generally more interested in higher quality/more sustainable wool....
Well, pricing out is real, even the junk parts are now at least 20% pricier than pre-covid, and I really hated myself for not bidding for SN2010M at $700 ~ $1500 range. Those are beautiful beasts.
Now it is all-aluminum!!!
(Bonus: Aluminum contracts and expand more making it more useful in multi-strata windings and using the expanded aluminum contacting with higher layer and in turn higher layers ... quicker.)
Ten years or so later, film suddenly becomes cool, prices skyrocket. Not surprising, I guess, since the supply is limited and shrinking every year. Then film itself started getting more expensive and older films discontinued.
I am able to offset some of the film cost issues by shooting mostly B&W and developing it myself. I bulk load 35mm to save even more. I use my DSLR for scanning. I do shoot color, but it's not a lot since I'm dependent on labs for the processing.
I have no idea what the Trump tariffs are going to mean for film. I love Ilford and Foma, both are imported. I'll use Kodak if I have to, but it's never my first choice.
My DSLR is a Canon APS-C model. Everything has gone mirrorless now. I don't plan to upgrade until my present camera stops working.