I didn't realize he was not part of svbtle, but it does seem like he's trying to claim credibility he hasn't earned by styling his blog as if he were a member. Svbtle is new enough that I don't know if there's much associated credibility, but still.
None of this is relevant to his point, which may as well be made as part of a chorus. Lots of people don't see the value.
I'm not sure being part of Svbtle lends anyone any "credibility".
Whether or not something is part of SVBTLE is about as important a point as whether it's written for Ars Technica, or for ZDNet: that is, not the most important thing about the piece, but by absolutely no means irrelevant.
Also, had this been an actual Svbtle piece, it would have carried the frisson of being a contrarian take on the work of another Svbtle author, since Svbtle is where Dalton Caldwell announced App.net to begin with.
Are we really that insecure? That any time anybody chooses to affiliate selectively in a new way, we have to cast aspersions?
Step 2: Close your eyes, hit ENTER, count to 10.
Step 3: Open your eyes and count to 10 again.
Step 4: Tell me how that argument still stands.
But dilution isn't the issue anymore. Curtis won: he's built a real blog network, with many very interesting writers. He's got Dalrymple writing about Mac stuff, Justin Kan from Justin.tv, Dave McClure from 500 Startups, and John Collison from Stripe. It's past time people stopped pretending like we're talking about a page of CSS.