Plus they already have a coding agent. This is beginning to feel like Yahoo 2.0.
When you have just raised $40 billion and you spend $3 billion on a company that has a product that you also build that is dumb as rocks.
When you have just raised $40 billion and you spend $3 billion on a company that has a product that you also build that is dumb as rocks.
I guess not mostly stock, but still half a billion cash, although not $1 billion. I guess my original point still stands, though it isn't quite as impactful an example. :)
[0] https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/facebooks-fi...
YouTube had the advantage of being able to post pirated videos something that I'm not sure Google would have been able to do. YouTube gained traction in ways Google couldn't duplicate.