We have a plethora of evidence on how destructive social media has been for (especially young) people and still nothing is being done about it.
We have a plethora of evidence on how destructive social media has been for (especially young) people and still nothing is being done about it.
Back then, if you rocked a Walkman, you carried 1 tape (about 60 minutes of music) that you listened to on repeat all day. That's very different from today's never ending stream of new media. A more interesting discussion would be about how we interact with media today vs back then.
Binge watching a reality dating show is not the same as intentionally watching a documentary about a subject you are interested in. The medium is not the key factor there.
How do you know that their interlocutors aren't listening to self-curated playlists a la mixtapes or to a carefully selected audiobook?
My view is that the "adults" are just as addicted as the kids and are afraid to admit it.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised. They were always loudly complaining about being made to read classical literature. "Whats the point" says people who insist they are independent thinkers.
All this garbage needs to go — period. We've seen time and time again that attempts to age-restrict Internet content with law just result in violations of privacy, while kids can still access such content with simple workarounds.
Discord's case is especially egregrious because there's so much low-hanging fruit they could pick to make kids safer on their platform.