The click bait title worked on me but come on, it’s like saying screwdrivers are evil or something. A framework is a tool that’s appropriate in some circumstances and not others.
I mean I do think the original article is an exaggeration (as is this analogy), and there are lots of tradeoffs to be made. E.g. in the Java ecosystem it's much easier to find a Spring Boot developer than someone who is willing to set up a project from scratch. Maybe that's a good thing for your project, but maybe it's not.
Maybe more apt would be that the stuff you built in the workshop doesn't fit out the door so you'd need to take it all apart to rebuild it somewhere else.
Still, the article is insensible. Frameworks are not evil. They do not have malicious aims. I think the worst we can say in that direction is that people get tribal about this kind of thing and insist their framework or way is the best and lose objectivity.
To continue butchering this analogy, craftspeople use unfamiliar workshops all the time and no one is preaching about the evils of pegboards for organization.