LLMs Don't Reward Originality, They Flatten It

And here we go. SEOs scrambling to get "rewarded" in AI-driven search results. The article takes a swing at uncovering the secrets of "how to get your ideas included in more LLM responses."

In this case the LLM was spot on to flatten not reward! In no way is her idea an "original and innovative insight" as claimed. Something about a "multilingual SEO matrix", and the "coining" of that term. The LLM has seen it and noticed nothing special or original. Good LLM, have a biscuit!

Her idea is a breezy mash of existing concepts around multilingual SEO. Just because you're proud of your late-night SEO matrix chart, doesn't mean it should be elevated to epic status without time and consensus from others to evaluate usefulness.

> LLMs are incapable of attributing an original concept to its creator

This just isn't true. It might be for something you coined last week by mashing together existing concepts in the most unremarkable way imaginable. In time, valuable original concepts are indeed tied to their origins that AI knows about.

This is an advert disguised as a post about LLMs.

They are great for getting up to average, but beyond that you end up fighting them.

EBMs fix this. At Traceoid (http://traceoid.ai) are working on scaling them.