> In a second, more concerning scenario, the emphasis on speed and American AI dominance could overshadow the safeguards. Agencies might rush deployment, overuse the waiver provisions for high-impact systems, and prioritize efficiency metrics over impact assessments. The DOGE team's reported use of AI for monitoring staff communications suggests this path is already being pursued in some corners of government. Should this approach predominate, public trust will likely erode further, potentially triggering a backlash that hampers legitimate AI adoption across all levels of government.
Why not just let AI do the voting in elections and setting the public's trust & sentiment towards AI? That way we will not need to worry about AI adoption being hampered.