You could always move to a country which doesn't fluoridate their water supply.
But I am struggling to see how this has anything to do with a white paper highlighting and examining flaws in another white paper.
But I am struggling to see how this has anything to do with a white paper highlighting and examining flaws in another white paper.
Nitpick, fluorinated water, i.e. treating water with fluorine gas, produces hydrofluoric acid, oxygen and heat. Not tasty. Or keep your face on-y.
Fluoridated water matches up the fluorine atoms with a buddy who keeps them in check before introducing it to water. (Sort of like why you wouldn’t want to eat a chunk of sodium.)
We no longer go out and find the magic rock that we lick to ensure a good harvest or drink from the special stream that cures illnesses: we know what the human body needs to be able to do things like "grow teeth" and "not develop scurvy". Why would we go back to making people have to do a bunch of work to get access to basic nutrition? Because some weirdos want to take us back to a time when the average life expectancy in the United States was 40 years old?
Did you have something on topic to contribute?
Or did you just want a soap box to voice your own opinions and I just happen to be collateral damage because you thought casting oblique aspersions about my qualifications would make you sound intelligent?