Hacker News Reader

finally, someone did it! luarocks was never an intuitive solution, and I feel this unintuitive ecosystem is one of the reasons for lua's low adoption.

View on HN

> one of the reasons for lua's low adoption

I think moreso is the complete lack of any "batteries included" whatsoever. Not even something so basic as sockets are supported by Lua's stdlib. The ecosystem has had to fill so many gaps and a lot of that is dependent on Leafo and LuaRocks.

I'm hoping the great mlua Rust crate will help build the ecosystem since now it's mostly trivial to build easily-distributable native Lua packages in Rust.

Lua fills its niche of no-fluff embeddable scripting language perfectly, the idea is to bind to your own code. It makes sense to me that they wouldn't focus heavily on the standard library. I think that if there is a large enough community of people who want to use Lua as a general purpose scripting language, they should maintain an unofficial stdlib.

Oh certainly and I'm not arguing against Lua's decisions to have a small stdlib. Just commenting on why it has seen low adoption outside of specific niches like scripting game engines, etc.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com