Monotype just hit us with a $30k/yr font license fee for one font

Pro tip: when you have a restrictive licence and suddenly they ask you for details of your actual use you reply "we use it accordingly to the terms of our licence" or you politely reply that they should direct any questions to your legal and licensing department.

On a side note, I am puzzled as to why a "small non-profit" would pay $4k a year to license a single font in the first place.

IMO, they need to deny they are breaching the terms of their current license, then drop that font completely, and then wave the bully bye bye.

> They said that if we don't continue licensing through them and "build a relationship," they'll have to charge us retroactively for our us

Maybe I misunderstood this but does this mean they are threatening if they stopped using the font/s and just move in they will come after them for the charges they think they owe them in the past?

It's possible the poster's business has very high requirements for fonts that justify paying a license, but for 99% of businesses that aren't focused on typography, wouldn't it make more sense to use open source fonts?

Is this the new patent trolling?