> Hence sourcing fertiliser from Russia was taken to be a strategic positive since it tired Russia to Europe.
And you still defend this as a strategic positive?
And you still defend this as a strategic positive?
Instead had I said this ten years ago, the majority of politicians in the EU would have been d’accord. What does that imply about our political systems?
There have been a bunch of alliances in Europe over the centuries, none have been permanent.
So... I think it was a good thing after all. It could've worked out, and bring us peace. A moonshot with great payoff but some chance of failing is often a risk worth taking, HN should know that :)