https://edition.cnn.com/2025/02/13/us/stonewall-inn-national...
Removing people from information about a historical event doesn't look good under any lens.
For example, see the section regarding "Zazu Nova" on the current page
https://www.nps.gov/ston/learn/photosmultimedia/virtual-fenc...
and before the erasure
https://web.archive.org/web/20250202042345/https://www.nps.g...
None of them implies the others. And using any term besides trans woman would be disingenuous, as trans people existed before before 1969, with that exact nomenclature already existing. Just because the letters might not have been attached to an "LGBT" title, neither T or Q are new. Only their increased acceptance and knowledge is.
And deleting references to those is, as you can see, seen as an obvious attempt to walk back on that public perception and acceptance.
While ( as often is ) a very summarized version of the history can be found on the wikipedia page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transgender_history , the sources should lead you to more detailed info, if you do care about learning about the historical accuracy.
Sources on the web refer to Nova having involvement with the Street Transvestites Action Revolutionaries group, which fits with that description also.