Nothing you said refutes any of my criticism.

Since you're accusing me of libel, I just checked the fomo website, and I can see that right now, it's presenting fake data. It shows a live updating counter of the number of fomo's impressions and clicks, but these numbers are updating every 200ms based on client-side JS, not real data. From the HTML source:

    setInterval(function() {
      var serverTimestamp = 1743654982;

      // impressions
      var imprCountWhenChecked = 19546526366;
      var imprFrequence = 80;
      var freshImprCount = Math.ceil(imprCountWhenChecked + (Date.now()/1000 - serverTimestamp) * imprFrequence);

      document.getElementById('statisticsTotalImprCount').innerHTML = freshImprCount.toLocaleString('en-US');

      // clicks
      var clickCountWhenChecked = 43316684;
      var clickFrequence = 0.15;
      var freshClickCount = Math.ceil(clickCountWhenChecked + (Date.now()/1000 - serverTimestamp) * clickFrequence);

      document.getElementById('statisticsTotalClickCount').innerHTML = freshClickCount.toLocaleString('en-US');
    }, 200);

I don't have a clean copy of the HTML source when you were running fomo, but I can see on an archive.org snapshot[0] that the customer count increases by exactly 7 every few hundred milliseconds, so it looks like this functionality was introduced while you were running fomo.

If the site fakes that data and you've publicly admitted to lying to your users in other cases, it increases the odds that other data you presented was inauthentic.

[0] https://web.archive.org/web/20181101030710/https://fomo.com/