Increadible that "but what about her emails" is still the only defense for sending military secrets over a non secure line to a journalist
As a company employee that's what you're supposed to do if copied wrongly on an email. In fact that's the usual disclaimer that appears in many email footers.
> As a company employee that's what you're supposed to do if copied wrongly on an email. In fact that's the usual disclaimer that appears in many email footers.
This analogy would make sense if the messages went to an employee of the federal government, but they didn’t.
It’s mind-bending that someone could be so bought into a bad situation that they try to shift blame to outside parties like this.
That's reckless.
Repeat - revealing sensitive info even if you come across by accident or someone's mistake is a crime. Esp national ones not just corporate secrets.
Kind of defeats the argument that content of messages will set back relations, affect future intelligence collection etc we kept hearing endlessly?!
Make up your mind. It's either important or not.