NASA's Curiosity rover has found the longest chain carbon molecules yet on Mars

Right, right, I'd put MS into my Blind Spot because there has got to be a much cheaper, more reliable, more scaleable/generalizable, less prone to over-engineering/misinterpretation option for detecting trace compounds, yes? (Our noses do it, at a speed faster than n per decade!!*)

[Seems JPL are more courageous^W patient^W adaptive than MMAANG!]

Follows (p3) the actually interesting phrase: what'd they mean by that? What provoked the peer reviewers?

"It is INTERNALLY ACCEPTED by the SAM team that a signal can be assessed from a S/N of 2 and the quantification is tentatively made from any detected m/z"

On reflection on the list I gave of DARPA-likes..

[Where might our intuitions diverge?]

Couple clues for it not being simply nostalgia:

1. The right question is closer to : why do breakthroughs announced by/awarded to MAANG these past decades not pass the optimal curiosity-agency smell test? Too teleological? Cheap conspiratorial answer is that they focused on investigations too expensive for academics to disprove/replicate. Less cheap answer is SV unwittingly replicated the structural issues of pre-lost-decade Japan (shareholder-supremacy? Overoptimistic metrics?)

2. Which brings me to: cultural premiums being nolonger affordable by gradstudents/good faith middle managers across the board

(Is it related to "supervision debt"? Or "moderation-technik debt")

*Related to the information bottleneck worked upon by my undersung hero Bialek?