Twitter (X) Hit by Data Leak of 2.8B Users – Allegedly an Insider Job
hackread.com
hackread.com
(The scale is much smaller than Twitter, though.)
Since it's public anyway, it's hard to say if being able to copy all the data is good or bad. There are tradeoffs.
We allow it for a public git repo. Is social media different? [2].
[1] https://bsky.app/profile/why.bsky.team/post/3lkwg2djrfk23
[2] The tree ring model of culture and politics - https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/03/29/treering.html
EDIT: That was apparently a mistake. Still, not all of the data in the dump is public or useless.
>Their theory that a disgruntled employee leaked the data during the layoffs remains unconfirmed, and there’s no concrete evidence to support it; it is only a plausible hypothesis given the timing and internal mess at X.
If this leak proves that more than 80% of Twitter accounts are bots, it should cause some damage
- probably all the data isn't from X
- the data seems to be all public - e.g.
- user ID and screen name
- number of followers
- number of tweets
- source of last Tweet (e.g. TweetDeck)
- location and timezone
- profile is protected or verified
I'm not sure that headline is very sensible to propagate. source: <a href="http://twitter.com/download/iphone" rel="nofollow">Twitter for iPhone</a>
which shows the tweet was posted from iOS.magnet:?xt=urn:btih:c963982c4ffa264fe76ec5918f83dd775521201b&dn=twitter_users_csv&tr=udp://tracker.openbittorrent.com:80&tr=udp://tracker.opentrackr.org:1337/announce
I wonder if the public is fully insensitive to these leaks now that we seem to have a big leak every other day.