Person of Interest continues to be prescient.
Looked into it a bit and it started out and only the last season has all of what you quoted. It's been really interesting watching the show evolve knowing what was happening in the world at the time. I'm currently on season 3 and they are starting to change the tone now that the Snowden leak has happened.
It starts out as:
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system — a machine — that spies on you every hour of every day. I know, because I built it. I designed the machine to detect acts of terror, but it sees everything. Violent crimes involving ordinary people. People like you. Crimes the government considered irrelevant. They wouldn't act, so I decided I would. But I needed a partner, someone with the skills to intervene. Hunted by the authorities, we work in secret. You'll never find us. But, victim or perpetrator, if your number's up, we'll find you."
So over the course of 5 years it morphs from "I know because I built it." to "A system you asked for, to keep you safe."
There are some bouts of introspection, especially early on, which he uses as justification for installing the backdoor in the first place, but on the whole he's adamant that none of this is his fault.
That's probably exactly how it will play out in our world too, when a tech billionaire plugs a self-aware AI to our global surveillance network.
> There are some bouts of introspection, especially early on, which he uses as justification for installing the backdoor in the first place, but on the whole he's adamant that none of this is his fault.
Well, at least until later, where I'd say his perspective evolved towards fear and eventually immense guilt ("selling the world for a dollar"), which made it hard for him to consider the possibility that what he created might want, and perhaps have a right, to live. Finch is the opposite of the "oops I guess but really I've done nothing wrong" kind of billionaire.
Meanwhile, you can also wear these: https://www.reflectacles.com/home
And, a bit of a reach, but it's also some of the foundation for "pre-crime" type stuff. "You've exhibited patterns of comings and goings that suggest..."
- Molotov, June 14, 1940
<Always has been dot jpeg>
>Say you're targeted for public speech someone doesn't like
More likely you're gonna get targeted because you shared memes that were too dank. They won't put you in jail. They'll just fine the shit out of you because their goal isn't to personally attack anybody, but to marginalize demographics they don't like.
For a peek at what you can expect, take a look at Saudi Arabia, where your bank account gets blocked until your traffic violation fine (usually issued electronically within minutes of the actual deed) is fully paid.
Or at China, where you "social score", more or less calculated automatically, decides in a fairly fine-grained manner what you are and are not allowed to do in society.
These will be become the social norm in the West as well, just a matter of time and getting the herd to consider it "normal" (usually takes a generation, 20-ish years).
Lol. Nobody will be able to track me as the guy crab-walking in a sumo suit wearing the Unabomber disguise.
https://www.wired.com/story/null-license-plate-landed-one-ha...
I believe the first one but likely BofA refusing to accept emails from his custom domain has nothing to do with it starting with null and everything to do with anti-spam.
Didn’t he get away on a bike into a park?
In that case the police had a Starbucks register photo with a face, but that kind of slip can also be easily avoided
That PARTICULAR slip can be avoided. Avoiding all slips is equivalent to airtight OpSec, which more people on this platform are familiar with (= not happening).
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2025/03/27/pikachu...
If you’re driving a car, yes. As we saw with Mangione’s escape, if you’re on public transit you’re much more anonymous. (Given the public risks inherent to driving, I think this is a fair trade—off.)
[1] https://abc7ny.com/brooklyn-shooting-subway-cameras-7-on-you...
"No escape" sounds still right.
That's not tractable at scale.
I think that means it doesn't matter what anyone thinks about anonymity in public places. We're already almost always seen by several cameras, and it will soon be 10x as much.
so you're saying that if we cycle everywhere on a non-descript black Dutch fiets we're safe ?