Hacker News Reader

Comment by lapcat | Hacker News Reader

See my blog post "The myth and reality of Mac OS X Snow Leopard": https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/2023/11/5.html

TL;DR What people remember fondly is not Mac OS X 10.6.0, which was in fact very buggy, and buggier than 10.5.8, but rather later versions of Snow Leopard after almost 2 full years of bug fixes.

See also "Snow Leopard bug deletes all user data": https://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyle/snow-leopard-bug-d...

The yearly release cycle is the problem. Apple needs "another Snow Leopard" only in the sense that I mentioned above, "almost 2 full years of bug fixes", although at this point, Apple has more than 2 years of technical debt.

View on HN

Thank you, the nostalgia for a 15-year-old OS release, which absolutely was not great out of gate, is strange.

My recommendation for people who don't absolutely need the latest features: Upgrade to the previous version of macOS when the new version is released. Sequoia is incredibly reliable 7 (soon to be 8) updates in.

> Sequoia is incredibly reliable 7 (soon to be 8) updates in.

I disagree with that part. ;-)

We wouldn't even be having this discussion right now if today's updates were incredibly reliable.

> later versions of Snow Leopard after almost 2 full years of bug fixes.

This is what’s being asked for in the article.

I disagree. From the article: "The same year Apple launched the iPhone, it unveiled a massive upgrade to Mac OS X known as Leopard, sporting “300 New Features.” Two years later, it did something almost unheard of: it released Snow Leopard, an upgrade all about how little it added and how much it took away. Apple needs to make it snow again. Snow Leopard did what it was made to do. It was one of the most solid software releases Apple ever put out." This gives the impression that it was solid out of the gate, which it was not. And the next paragraph specifically mentions "2009’s Snow Leopard". But later Snow Leopard releases were in 2011.

Grandempire is right on my overall sense in the piece, though perhaps I should have made its ore explicit. I actually faired quite well with 10.6.0. But, the lack of push for a yearly set of headlining features did allow the OS to age quite well in the years after, too. It's the drumbeat of what 10 stunning new features will be unveiled each WWDC for each platform that means past features rarely get the continued polishing they need to shine.

the myth has indeed become everyone's reality

Reply on news.ycombinator.com