Over 4M Gen Zers are jobless–experts blame worthless degrees and broken promises
fortune.com
fortune.com
I’m old enough to remember the same type of argument playing out when corporate executives sent US jobs overseas in the 80s and blamed the workers then too.
If humanities or social science degrees are now (economically) worthless, it would be interesting to examine why. Have universities failed to make courses of study intellectually challenging? Are students cheating their way through? Do employers no longer understand the value of employees who are skilled at reading, writing, and critical thinking?
It looks like the most popular non-professional track degrees in the UK are Psychology, Economics, and History. Is it not useful to have employees who have some understanding of how people think, feel and interact, how money and markets work, or how and why things happen over time?
They leave college with a piece of paper while they can barely do high school math, evidenced by the fact that they signed a loan for 6 figures without actually thinking about it.
I don’t have that piece of paper and while I’ve done OK in tech, there are structural barriers to advancement without a degree.
the majority are simply following what the system dictates. deviating from that system is difficult and not for the faint of heart.
That is false and is at best a flippant assessment. Society places substantial pressure on high schoolers to attend university, especially in the middle class, and the loans were presented to them as an option commonly taken by your peers. At 18-ish, peer pressure can be massive and, tied in with the uncertainty about the near future, any revealed life path can seem perfectly acceptable.
> an entire generation demanded easy degrees
This is also false, an entire generation wanted to move forward with life and college seemed like the correct choice to them (regardless of if it was actually a correct choice). They didn’t demand easy degrees.
But, yeah, for Gen Z its “worthless degrees” and for older people in tech its “AI”, and for every other group there is some other micro-explanation, and the huge macro-facts that we know from historical experience drive (un)employment are mysteriously not having their normal effects.