Shipping rates hit zero as trade sinks
telegraph.co.uk
telegraph.co.uk
BDI is a nice indicator of economy because 1) it's not speculative(you don't buy shipping without products), 2) it's not elastic(it takes years to build another ship and it's not easy or cheap to take ships of circulation).
http://www.minneapolisfed.org/publications_papers/studies/re...
Your comment implies that in the case of a disastrous implosion of the global economy, the window of predictability would be so narrow that there would be no point in trying to anticipate it; and that while we wait to see what's going to happen, there's no use listening to the ongoing chatter of "hand waving, theories and speculation".
But is that really true?
I think it behooves us to keep evaluating information as it streams in. (Attempting to discount the speculators and "people trying to Prove a Point, as always.)
The lucky ones?
This is true. In the case of repeatable events, over time, the former will do better than chance and the latter will do as well as chance.
I'm talking about the former, not the latter.
Anyway thanks for the recommendation.
"Mr de Trenck predicts Asian trade to the US will fall 7pc this year. To Europe he estimates a drop of 9pc -- possibly 12pc. Trade flows grow 8pc in an average year."
Industry sources said they have never seen rates fall so low. "This is a whole new ball game," said one trader.
Perhaps trade could be encouraged to healthy levels by subsidizing importation.