> Also I have 10G networking, so the ethernet switches are hot and expensive.
I never understand why anyone needs anything faster than 1G (other than to flex for Internet points). Seriously, how often do you need to move data faster than 100MB/s? Almost never. FYI: A 2.5G switch should be fine. There are many fan-less options here: https://www.servethehome.com/the-ultimate-cheap-2-5gbe-switc...i just upgraded my home network from 40g to 100g. g, not m. Anyone who does video knows the pain of 10g.
I don't think your situation is common.
So can I ask you what is the advantage for using 10G equipment in your case? Even something really dull like network card costs around 100€.
I have symmetric 3Gbps fibre to the home via Bell Canada and it reports 4.5Gbps via fast.com.
My PCIe5 SSD can do 14 GB/s, or about 112 gbit/sec.
Did some research. 10gbe cards are about $30, 100gbe qsfp28 cards are about $300, 100gbit 100m transciever about $100.
Like - 50GB at 3gbps is ~130 seconds, ~160 seconds at 2.5gbps, and ~400 seconds at 1gbps
You're always waiting at least a couple minutes, and never more than 10 for that download.
Personally - I have a couple 10gbps switches that run my backbone in my house (NAS, k8s cluster, HomeAssistant, etc) and I have a 2gbps symmetric wan, but all of the offices (my wife and I both work from home, plus the media room, plus the kid's playroom) all just run 1gbps switches.
They're cheap, normal office work basically never saturates those speeds (even multiple conference calls with video is a-ok), and there's just not enough value in bumping up to 10gbps across the whole house compared to the equipment cost.
The 10gbps switches live in the basement and just connect those zones.