You clearly have not watched the talk. His point isn't that "coders" aren't "programmers", but that coding — i.e. the act of writing code, i.e. text in a programming language, i.e. text that can be interpreted and run by a computer — isn't the same as programming, which is the act of efficiently producing software that does what's expected of it. He attempts to show why only writing code is not the best way to produce software that does what's expected of it. You can agree or disagree, but it has nothing to do with how anyone calls themselves.