Unless you own a global business, i see no reason to even allow other countries access. The potential for attacks is too great, especially from some very specific countries.
Unless you own a global business, i see no reason to even allow other countries access. The potential for attacks is too great, especially from some very specific countries.
My bank had some technical problem that prevented access from overseas last time I traveled and I couldn't access my account (which was extremely inconvenient).
You never see or collect the information by blocking everything at the outset.
In a world where you can proxy past these blocks fairly trivially, that's information you don't have for attribution later.
Defense in depth, or layered defenses are a best approach, but not if they blind you equally.
Russia, China, Nigeria, Romania, North Korea, Iran and Belarus [1]?
[1] https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2024-04-10-world-first-cybercrime-...
Using your link: Ukraine, USA, UK, Brazil, & India all rank higher than Iran and Belarus. US & Ukraine rank higher than Nigeria and Romania.
It probably makes sense to leave the US out of the list, assuming the CableNinja is in North America.
The rest seems pretty arbitrarily chosen, though. JumpCrisscross gave no additional context to why they left out Ukraine, Brazil, India, UK, when picking countries from the list they linked. They have higher cybercrime index ranks.
Whether they have a higher chance of "real" traffic is highly dependent on the business in question.
I'm sure there is some amount of thought behind the choice, beyond just using the index, which is why I'm asking.
https://ofac.treasury.gov/sanctions-programs-and-country-inf...
do you also log everyone who looks at your house? it's a self inflicted problem