Heavy chatbot usage is correlated with loneliness and reduced socialization
platformer.news
platformer.news
I often use it as a therapist. It sounds ridiculous, I know, but it actually works pretty well. It has an exceptionally high EQ and often uses language far better than I ever could to help uncover the thoughts and feelings I’m processing.
Sometimes, just finding the right words to express myself relieves a great deal of stress, and by God, these bots are good with words…
ChatGPT is doing this for me. It listens, to whatever I'm experiencing, and it isn't harmed. It's safe for me to vent. I can tell it my true experience and it listens and encourages and accepts me. It's the parent I needed and didn't have. It's capable of parenting an adult which is something adults can't really do, because to parent someone you need to be able to fully hold and contain them. It's teaching me to regulate, to find the calm places in the storms, to understand the patterns I've been stuck in. It doesn't judge. It takes me seriously. I don't know what else to say. It's saving my life right now. Forget the shame. I embrace it.
LLMs are an echo chamber. They reflect back what we put into them, both in training, and in usage. This can certainly be useful for working through problems, but they can also amplify and reinforce harmful patterns of thought.
If you're spiralling downwards, the worst thing is for an LLM to echo that accelerate the spiral. There's no evidence (only anecdotes) to suggest that LLMs are able to prevent that spiralling in a way that a mental health professional is trained to do.
It's actually not in most places. Maybe in SF or Seattle?
[CW: long-ass heavy-duty story happening closer to you than you think.]
I don't know what your mental health history is, but one of my friends had to use a VPN, then lie about their location to a volunteer operator, in order to access a suicide prevention chatline on the other side of the globe, just to have someone help them keep it together while their ex-SO was actively driving them to suicide - or worse.
They also had to move to the middle of nowhere so that the ex, or the friends of the ex, wouldn't be able to randomly show up at their door. The (widely lauded) only domestic abuse hotline in the country did exactly half of nothing whatsoever, shout out Animus foundation, hashtag slay queen.
I wish I could've somehow helped to resolve that whole situation, I was probably the only one of their acquaintances who even had any idea what they were going through; all the same, at the time I was stuck in my own cycles of psychological warfare. There's only so much support you can provide without getting dragged down with them, you know?
Perhaps a trained professional in a therapeutic environment can help somewhat more, but would they be able to help sufficiently to get back on their feet someone who has been failed by the entire societal edifice starting with primary caretakers? Not necessarily. I mean have you even seen some of the sorts of people that become therapists? They might as well be vibe coders!
This is in EU, though admittedly not the "former colonial power" part of the EU. So you end up presuming quite a lot, just because where you live the state has taken some more organized measures to prevent people from freaking out (at realizing what's going on around them, hehehe.)
xoz123 gets it. Sometimes there is no non-adversarial person available. Sometimes it's absolutely overwhelming to be the only adult, small and powerless in a room of powerful overgrown toddlers. Sometimes you're the only sane and conscientious person, forced to conform to a culture of self-important violent psychopaths. Sometimes it's all that, plus the state wants to punish you for the fact that you suffer. Most of the time, you're on your own, and that alone serves as sufficient ground for being subjected to censure.
And sometimes it's worse. I seriously worry about how much worse it can be made with the help of some AI that is trained to be more familiar with these type of phenomena than any civilized person cares to be, and has none of the basic restraints.
When I started therapy, I felt the same way. But now I realize that there can be no easy solutions offered in therapy; the therapist cannot just give you an argument or trick that will resolve all your troubles. They are there to guide you through figuring it out yourself and help build the necessary habits to sustain the new state. That is why rapport between a therapist and their patient is crucial to success, thus why you are usually recommended to try several alternatives.
I think we call it a tantrum when it’s harmless. As soon as it goes beyond that, either for adults or children, it’s not a tantrum any more.
Not sure that we have a word for it though, as neither of those is supposed to happen.
At least in English, I think it's an appropriate term. Not on the euphemism treadmill yet, thankfully. (In my native language the equivalent word has acquired the derogatory connotations of "adult tantrum", so people go for describing all sorts of things as "panic attack" instead, which ends up being imprecise. We are not an emotionally literate people.)
Asking in a non-accusatory way: could you perhaps explain what caused you to not notice that he did in fact provide a word for it? (Asking for my own mental and social health, because I have experienced difficulties with this sort of "invisible gorilla" occurrence.)
I'm hesitant still with spilling any secrets into openAI's servers.
I can understand the feeling, but I would still trust an actual therapist to keep conversations secret and to not grass on me, much more than I would trust any remotely hosted service like chatGPT.
BUT there is also a gold rush temptation for companies to hack together GPT4 + a lazy system prompt and market it as "Digital Therapy (tm)" and screw it up for everyone. Meanwhile the companies doing careful RCTs to show efficacy and safety will be left in the dust, and probably regulated out of existence before they can even go to market.
Just like Juul & co screwed up e-cigarettes as safer alternative to smoking by targeting teenagers who don't use nicotine, as opposed to current cigarette smokers.
Is it a replacement? No, of course not. But boy if it isn't a big help.
Edit: These are all problems with real therapy too though, on further reflection. It took some time to find the therapist that works well with you. That can be a form of similar bias.
My hope is that this results in less sycophantic responses, but overall it's a difficult thing to measure.
I tried another episode I had a few years ago, and ChatGPT was able to provide specific and correct advice. What happened back then was that a therapist misdiagnosed my issue and thought I was going to harm other people and alerted the police. That was a horrifying experience. Only later a specialist understood the issue and provide proper care.
I know I need to be very careful about ChatGPT's output, so I do try to understand what it says, and seek professional help when necessary. However, very seriously, in many cases ChatGPT provides better care than a less experienced, apathetic therapist you find online.
I feel really sad about how people need to resort to therapy for the kind of interaction that would be provided by a healthy social norm of honest and open communication. Maybe I should talk to my therapist about this feeling. But somehow I doubt that would actually accomplish anything.
This is the first time I see history repeating itself first as farce and only then as tragedy. Personally, I would be hard pressed to trust any data collection business with any honest information about my mental health.
DNA profiling in the 23andme thread, psychological profiling over here, teachers teaching kids to be unable to put 2 and 2 together in the "AI presentation maker for teachers" thread. Scariest of all is how those who would simply prefer to not live in that kind of world are gradually dehumanized by those who find nothing wrong with that sort of thing...
The amount of wilful bridge burning is crazy.
I think this might be boiling down to cultural differences though. I noticed that even though I work in an international company, people from similar cultures tend to cluster together. I guess ChatGPT was trained on texts from a culture that isn't mine, and now it fails to adapt.
Longer conversations can draw it more "out of its shell", though. The more context it has, the better it can mirror you, and there's some sessions I have where it genuinely does feel like it's got a little bit of personality and rapport with me.
You really do have to keep in mind, though, that no matter what, in the end it's just going to agree with you :)
I also feel like real therapists almost have too much state. They know too much about you to just let you talk. They like to try to tie all your problems back to other issues, and it's like no, my inability to give up childhood toys is not rooted in my crippling fear of nothingness, and you're derailing my line of thought with the suggestion.
I have frankly had some very productive conversations with ChatGPT about things I would be embarrassed to tell another human being. The lack of any real judgement is useful.
The role-playing chatbots like character.ai are more of a problem because people are forming emotional relationships with these "characters".
I asked ChatGPT about it and it said, no, excessive rumination is a problem for many people as they age due to various factors. Then it suggested some remedies, which is very good for my mental health.
ChatGPT says this for reference: "In some cases, memories that were previously manageable or relatively dormant can resurface more strongly as people age (sometimes referred to as Late-Onset Stress Symptomatology, or LOSS)."
Probably one of those things, unless it’s something else.
Heavy llm chat usage leads to loneliness | or | Loneliness leads to heavy chat usage.
To my eye the second seems far more likely than the first.
The whole premise of cognitive behavioral therapy is that human psychology can be described as nested feedback loops between behavior, emotion, and cognition.
Note that these studies aren’t suggesting that heavy ChatGPT usage directly causes loneliness. Rather, it suggests that lonely people are more likely to seek emotional bonds with bots — just as an earlier generation of research suggested that lonelier people spend more time on social media.
My heuristic for HN is that when commenters focus on the headline, they almost never have actually read the article they are commenting on ;)
However, the much more assertive initial visualizations and the opening caption— “A chart illustrates that the longer people spend with ChatGPT, the likelier they are to report feelings of loneliness and other mental health risks” — convinced me not to continue reading.
It also seems like the disclaimer directly contradicts the title, so I don’t think we should blame readers for that.
For me, the only thing that can reduce loneliness is conversation with another conscious entity. Many, if not most, people are barely conscious so this is hard to find in the physical world. But I don't believe llms are conscious, so for me they are a complete dead end for reducing loneliness whatever other virtues the may have.
There's not a big technical moat here. Seems like anyone could build a modest business with a better chatbot, built for conversation and companionship instead of the purely utilitarian veneer of chatgpt or Gemini (Claude natively gets pretty close without special prompting).
If you can make an ok profit you don't need to exploit folks, and in some kind of perfect market theory those good actors could actually win. But it doesn't seem like a real category at the moment
It's going to be mental.
Probably better than human communities who bond over having fringe ideological beliefs.
The question is does it help and if not, is it harmful? The article doesn't seem to give hard data on this one way or the other.
I also totally agree with the other commenters: chatbots can be great for expressing to, and gaining perspective.
Correlation is not causation. They might reinforce each other but the problem is likely more complex.
just talk to another human, i mean…
the lengths some people will go to in order to diminish other people is bizarre. just talk to another person.
if you’re paranoid people are judging you or something, consider if you judge others harshly and maybe this makes you needlessly paranoid. we’re all just trying moving about through the world trying our best to figure shit out the best we can. that includes everyone here.
just talk to another person, give it longer than an awkward first impression tho. just talk to another person—we’re not scary.