How does it compare to Google's https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08252-9
"Observations" is overloaded; it's really any "raw" weather data product, like satellite imagery, surface station measurements, or weather balloon traces. I'm handwaving away a lot of complexity here.
The AardvarkWeather model is a significant new development and paradigm shift - it's one of the first models of a new class which do not require an analysis, and can directly use the "raw" weather data observations that are typically used to perform data assimilation.