It doesn't.
But if you feel they're magic, you'll never believe that a "random" mechanical process, which you think you can interrogate, could ever really have that spark.
It doesn't.
But if you feel they're magic, you'll never believe that a "random" mechanical process, which you think you can interrogate, could ever really have that spark.
I'm comfortable with saying that this way of answering the question doesn't work, because the argument is simply, "How can it be false if I believe it's true?"
Philosophy of mind hasn't started nor ended with Dennett, and definitely not with AI hype manufacturers.
Or possibly... There is something else going on, and we just haven't figured it what it is yet. I'm not betting either way at this point.
LLMs lack the capacity for invention and metacognition. We're a long way from needing to talk about qualia; these things are NOT conscious and there is no question.
This website is absurd. "I don't think LLMs are all they're cracked up to be" "YOU'RE JUST MAD BECAUSE QUALIA AND YOU WANT TO BE MAGIC"
no the "magic" text generator just writes bad code, my dude
Only the people on r/singularity care about qualia in this context and let us remember this is a mechanism without even a memory
So every time it proves it can, they move the goalposts and invent a truer Scotsman who can never be replaced by a machine. Because they know it can't do person things. It's a machine.