if they can polish up the public facing side of the project, it would instill more confidence.
In other documents too. And very repetitive.
I don't need a link to Wikipedia every time "PoC" is used. Or to an online man page every time strace(1) is mentioned.
I get it that a documentation can have more than one "entry point", and hyperlinking all occurrences solves that.
But I think assuming certain audience leads to a document that is more effective. You don't explain addition in university-level textbooks, to make it easier to children from primary school.
This product is simply not for people who hear of strace for the first time.
The bigger issue IMO is that the links seem to be automatically-generated, and the generation is a bit sloppy; for example, the "Syd" links should probably link to the sandboxing technology instead of Pink Floyd's original frontman.
I dare you, check the git history! (if you care anyway)
It's all manually crafted, with love. From the Shine On You Crazy Diamond badge at the top down to the very last link.
Wikipedia needs some notion of "suggested links" that don't become links unless the text is selected or they're toggled globally or some other explicit action. With those, authors could go and link every last word if they like.
Tip: in Firefox, you can hold Alt to drag and select text without triggering links.
Still using Chrome for work stuff, since profile management in FF is still pure hate.
It's been a few years, so I'll give profiles another try I guess. Containers likely won't do it since multiple profiles all use the same domain (console.aws.amazon.com being the obvious one).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Link...