One mother's win over Meta will change social media for everyone
thetimes.com
thetimes.com
The problem is that it's not entirely clear to most users that it's free because of targeted ads. Yes, we on HN are very aware of this, but it's not made explicitly clear to users upon registration. If you're going to make this argument, then you need to be honest and clear with your users up front.
Edit: And maybe give them an alternative if they don't like that option.
Edit 2: And to say this when you used to plaster on the homepage, "It's free, and always will be"? C'mon now.
… in the UK
Especially with a lot of UK papers printing "US editions" now - even the goddamn BBC redirects me to a "US news" site when I attempt to access BBC News. If I wanted US-centric news the BBC is probably the last place I'd check but I guess clicks and ad revenue reign supreme.
Just another clickbait title, please move along.
It’s like if a drug dealer keeps mixing your cocaine with fent, you force them to give you the good stuff instead of just trying to end your coke habit altogether.
I think you must be very privileged to fight these kind of battles.
For sure other drug dealers are upset now and will complain why would a person fight them instead just buying from other dealer or just stop using/
And aren't we meant to use our privelege to help others? I'm not sure when privelege became a dirty word.
I think a better comparison could be a supermarket. Just because they sell cigarettes and alcohol doesn’t mean you can just not go there. You still need groceries.
https://www.tnssolutions.co.uk/post/how-much-of-london-is-co...
https://www.theverge.com/2019/12/9/21002515/surveillance-cam...
Here's a nice quote from the former (2019-2023) UK Defense Secretary: "well for one the people who love encryption most are pedophiles." https://x.com/BenWallace70/status/1892972120818299199