I understand that the theoretical motivation for models is often more math-heavy, but I'm skeptical that motivations need always be mathematical in nature.
I understand that the theoretical motivation for models is often more math-heavy, but I'm skeptical that motivations need always be mathematical in nature.
For example, how would you know optimizing a convolution kernel is a good idea if you aren’t familiar with linear time invariant systems?
I mean computer scientists really do like to pretend like they invented the whole field. Whereas in reality the average OS, compilers, networks class has nothing to do with core ML. But of course are also important and these barbs dont get us anywhere.
Also, without Shannon you wouldn't have neither Telecomms nor Computer Science.
Heck, Lisp it's just a formalisation and implementation of Lambda Calculus, which began as a paper... from a Mathematician.
Also: https://hakmem.org
Forget any serious reading without Math skills.