Hacker News Reader

Not the topic of this piece, but every time I use reasoning models to do any serious analysis, all I can think is how in 1990, if you showed this to literally any person on the planet, they would have agreed that it was AGI, and we still argue over that for some reason.

View on HN

At least for me, my litmus test (today) would require an AGI model to respond with "huh I really don't know" instead of confidently making up garbage when it, in fact, has no clue.

I don't think I'd have expected differently even in 1990.

Because we know how it works, and we've seen how it fails.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com