iPhones were being stolen off porches right after delivery, and now we know how
9to5mac.com
9to5mac.com
I'm not sure if this is universal, or region-specific, but out of all the times that I've received something that's been signature-required, it's incredibly rare (single-digit percent) that the driver will actually get my signature. Usually when I see the "SIGNED BY XYZ" note on the delivery notification, it's some random name.
90+% of the time they don't even check my ID when it's a wine delivery, like they're supposed to.
Drivers are overworked and have too many deliveries on their plate. They're not going to bother to get signatures.
"Sign here"
"What is it? Who is the recipient?"
"Just sign"
Like, you don't know what you've signed for until after signing for it.
Yeah, I don’t hold this against them at all. My USPS delivery driver asked me the other day if he could just leave packages requiring a signature on my porch going forward and I told him that was fine.
I have cameras, I work from home, we don’t have porch pirates in this area (or at least in it’s never happened in the last 5 years I’ve been here).
On the other hand, I don’t trust FedEx/UPS at all. I had a Steam Deck stolen in-transit (an empty box was delivered to my porch) and then I had another Steam Deck stolen from a pickup box (I assume stolen by a driver, not from the box directly). The first one I was able to prove and get a free replacement. The second one was something I couldn’t prove and I ate the loss (~$600 IIRC, I keep trying to forget it). I’ll never trust a dropbox again with anything expensive. Arguably I should have been smarter but up till that point I’d returned 10+ $1000+ iPhones the same way without issue.
Which is weird, as you, the customer, don't have any leverage in enforcing any behavior of the shipping company (like make sure package is signed for). You can't even select them.
Apple for example charges you $9 for expedited shipping, which is essentially Uber delivery. But when the delivery person takes off with your $1,200 phone they don't have to replace it. It is on you: https://law.stackexchange.com/a/73842
When this whole thing is flipped around, where the sender is responsible until the buyer actually has it in their hands the whole system all of the sudden becomes incentivized to minimize losses.
(sidenote: it is a disgrace that Stackoverflow doesn't allow you to turn off auto-sharing of your ID when you share a link).
Consequently, you only ever really see this kind of blase delivery from Amazon, who I guess are rich enough to absorb the cost.
Sweet innocent child, so lucky never to have suffered (edit: the low cost UK courier) Hermes. Their definition of delivered to you regularly includes left in a bush 3 streets over at a random address
Your first paragraph is totally correct and I wish more people stopped wasting so much energy chasing couriers when it's not their job. However, there is a certain reality when people expect free or <£3 delivery costs
Most people pronounce the courier like Her-mies which reminds you of herpes which is apt.
"Evri delivery is a nightmare"
I asked CashApp to step in and refund me and they said "Look chum, the FedEx ticket says DELIVERED".. and I'm like "Yes, but not to me" and they said "Yeah we get that, but our policy states if its DELIVERED it's over with. How about we just terminate your CashApp account for complaining?"
With a debit card, chargebacks are not a legal right, but often platforms will do them for you. Not sure exactly why CashApp weren't happy with you for asking, but maybe they felt like you hadn't tried hard enough with the seller, or that you were trying it on.
That said, my understanding from general opinions about CashApp is that them terminating your account is probably a net benefit for you in the long term, rather than something to rue.
Disputes/chargebacks is the very last remnant of "consumer protection" in the US that actually works - which is why nobody with money is actually incentivized to spread good words about it, and as a result it's not common knowledge even on HN.
Unless you live in a detached home, "overnight shipping" just means someone's going to call you at 5:30am asking how to enter your apartment and then try again in two days when you don't pick up. One time I did this dance for a week because they kept coming at 4am, and I feel bad for them too, but c'mon "4am-8am" delivery, and they don't have Amazon Locker access?
I wish I could disable it permanently.
In cases like this where it is third party (in this case FedEx), there’s no way to manage that.
Technical solutions always fail to solve social trust problems.
When the compensation for stolen items starts being taken out of their pay, they will stop ignoring it.
Never did find out what happened to it, fortunately the seller was willing to send a replacement to make it right.
> employee also received bonuses of $2,000-2,500 for recruiting other AT&T employees into the scheme.
What other high value items are shipped regularly? I thought Costco started selling gold recently, which seems way more lucrative and harder to trace than phones.
Looks like a not-so complex, multi-faceted LLM was used to help write this article :)
Same applies to any stolen phones btw.
It's extra work for the carrier and can result in innocent people being denied service so they lean towards not banning IMEIs.
Also it can be spoofed so it isn't a surefire way to ban these devices.
Then you go into a kafkaesque process with Amazon, who say “sure buddy, we sent you something else”, and then you have to file a police report and probably have to claw the money back which leads to the forfeiture of your account.
A good solution I’ve seen from Otto, another big eshop here in Germany is that they seal the package with tape that can’t be removed without damaging either the tape or the box and you are instructed not to accept the package if it’s been tampered with.
In my country, at least, some provider is now requiring related party's phone number to be included in order to access the tracking data. [1]
It's easier to think of them turning _risks_ of occasional large losses into a steady constant flow of losses.
Whatever level of verification you pick, an insurance company can give you a quote. If you want to implement a very lax policy (without even a photo of the package on the doorstep), the insurance company will charge you an arm and a leg for coverage.
If you pick a more robust system, the insurance will become cheaper.
So if you have two insurance providers with the same written down policies, but one provider A usually pays out, and the other B fights it tooth and nail, then provider A has an easier time selling their services for a higher price. Reputation matters.
Thus in the end (assuming some competition) the actual policies as implemented matter more than what's written down.
They never do that here in Australia. Either sign for it, or you get a card saying where you can go and pick it up, with ID.
I found the parcel outside my front door like all the other parcels.
Ultimately if the drivers are strongly incentivised to be fast, and not strongly incentivised to follow process, they won’t follow process.
We don’t need another social science thesis over this. Just like the blonde millionaire in San Diego who organized a crime ring in California, there are people who know how to run other criminal organizations.
Doesn't that imply that those places have package thievery problems far worse than in the US?
Is this not the case for America ?