Greenpeace must pay millions over Dakota pipeline protests, says jury
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
“The problems included a jury that was patently biased in favor of Energy Transfer, with many members working in the fossil fuel industry; a judge who lacked the requisite experience and legal knowledge to rule properly on the complex First Amendment and other evidentiary issues at the center of the case; and incendiary and prejudicial statements by lawyers for Energy Transfer that tried to criminalize Greenpeace and by extension the entire climate movement by attacking constitutionally-protected advocacy.”
“In my six decades of legal practice, I have never witnessed a trial as unfair as the one against Greenpeace that just ended in the courts of North Dakota. This is one of the most important cases in American history.”
https://www.trialmonitors.org/statement-of-independent-trial...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2025/03/1...
$300m for helping people protest the destruction of their land and water isn't something we can accept; as a society, or as individuals.
If we allow this to go down like that, shrugging off this scale of corruption as mere business as usual, then we'll (continue to) get exactly what we deserve.
Three hundred million dollars - and ETP don't even appear to have had actual evidence of anything Greenpeace did to 'incite criminal behavior'. Just a stacked jury in a cherry-picked court. $300m, for helping a peaceful protest get attention... I think Greenpeace USA have about $20m in assets?