Richard Stallman safe after Peru earthquake
en.wikinews.org
en.wikinews.org
SwellJoe safe after Peru earthquake.
Paris Hilton safe after Peru earthquake.
About 6 billion people I don't know safe after Peru earthquake.
Anybody else think this is an utter waste of a headline/link? Everyone except the people injured or lost in the Peru earthquake is safe after the earthquake. We don't need a headline about every single one of them. The silly rumor about isn't news, and the fact that it was a rumor is certainly now news.
But maybe I'm just grouchy because I'm coming down with yet another summer cold (God must have smote me because of my atheism).
Frankly, a belief that natural disasters only strike highly religious areas is quite strange, and I see no evidence for it. As Goladus pointed out, San Francisco gets earthquakes; that was also the first thing I thought of. But is there any part of the planet that doesn't suffer from natural disasters? I don't think anybody could make the original assertion without realizing these problems, and my explanation shouldn't be needed. If I could, I would have downmodded it.
non-religious: 11.92%
atheist: 2.35%
For every earthquake in San Francisco it seems reasonable to expect at least 6 or 7 in other parts of the world.I downmodded because I'd rather this forum not be burdened with trite religion-bashing posts.