I always feel that we are inclined to ask this question because we want to treat the wavefunction as if it were a probability distribution. While they share some properties, fundamentally they are not the same thing.

In typical probability, we deal with an ensemble of fixed states, or at least phenomena that can be simulated as such.

In quantum physics, the wavefunction is fundamental. The question "what was the exact path?" is meaningless. In particular, if we take the approach of Feynman path integrals, we find that particles take many paths - including circular paths through each slit - before arriving somewhere else where they interact (i.e., become entangled) with, say, an electron in the screen.

Sure, we may consider different experiments (e.g., quantum erasers, see https://lab.quantumflytrap.com/lab/quantum-eraser), but analogies with deterministic particles are whimsical - sometimes they work, sometimes not.