I wonder how human society would evolve if this were the case for us.
An evolution (or artificial 'population management') where males are 66% likely or otherwise born at a 2:1 ratio wouldn't work because then you need each woman to have 3 children to create a sustainable population, meaning you need an even higher ratio of males - and so on recursively towards infinite male:female ratios.
Women don't do outright cannibalism since humans are more sophisticated, but women absolutely kill (figuratively) their mate/husband to extract as much ressource as possible (regardless of them having offspring in needs or not).
They are biologically programmed for that, but we forgot about it and/or we like to pretend this is not happening.
Reality doesn't care much about feeling, and with little countermeasures afforded to the men, birthrate has been going down tremendously in every country where women power has been unmatched.
So, the answer is actually pretty simple: it will die down until the only ones left are the males that found a new "venom" and are willing to use it.
Too much Andrew Tate?
There are horror stories where a wife divorces the man and gets the house, custody of the kids, child support, alimony, etc. Many men just opt to not get married for fear that might happen to them.
They didn't just claim that divorces can have unfavorable results for men which is a trivial claim.
They claimed birth rates are tumbling because women have attained the extractive power mentioned in their post and that, if left unchecked, human society will continue dying down... until all that's left is the sort of man that he likens to the venomous male octopus.
Many people don't want to have kids unless they are married. They don't get married because of the issues I mentioned.
Even if you ignore that, you may have to pay child support if the woman you slept with leaves you.
Also, asking for a prenup is not exactly the easiest thing. Can you imagine saying, hey I want to get married, quite possibly saying "till death do us part", but can you agree too this prenup for when we fail. Starting a marriage with the idea that you will fail doesn't seem great to me.
I read that some politicians in a. state (don't remember which), were talking about allowing a couple to remove the right of a no fault divorce, only allow at fault divorces. I think if such a thing becomes a law, that would help boost a lot of confidence for men.
He is obviously a despicable character but it's not surprising that he was able to get where he is. He is the symptom of a general sickness nobody wants to acknowledge, the only ones breaking through are the extreme assholes, nobody listen to the nuanced position and we even tell them they are like those extreme assholes.
Which is exactly what you did, and you very astutely showed exactly that there is a problem and that you are part of the problem.
Good job, thanks.