That's not how error percentage works and why do we all just accept that everything has become mediocre?
Could it be better still? Sure, but I see no reason to assume that people are somehow lowering standards and not working on making it both cheaper and better all the time.
So I don't see an easy solution apart from governmental regulation. But you need a consistently stellar government for that.
I just don't care how accurate that the watch is (thus far anyway) because the perception of progress—delusional or no—is why I use it.
Generally, though, my perceived performance is reflected in the relative numbers. If I felt otherwise I too would be complaining about accuracy.