> it is very very clear, that the atheletes were custom fitted into the altered squirl suits
Aren't the suits tested for compliance on the athlete?
> trained specificaly and extensivly in there optimal use. traditional ski jumps were done with the legs fully closed, with a last second switch to a landing posture
I honestly don't see this.
I've looked at quite a few videos now, comparing the techniques between other jumpers and their medal winning jump.
It looks close enough to me and, honestly, plenty of experts, too, otherwise they would have pointed to the difference in techniques enabled by the altered suits, rather than only having to rely on finding alterations after taking the suit apart.
That's half of the drama: suits have RFID chips identifying them. After the suits have been tested (as this sort of shenanigans is pretty common in this sport), they resew the chips from verified suits onto the tricksuits. This was caught on the video.
Exaggerating the changes, if the suits are not the official suits, they may get more distance with an improvised version of a wingsuit[1]?