The FAA's Troubles Are More Serious Than You Know
theatlantic.com
theatlantic.com
In my experience as a pilot, sometimes the FAA makes rules that are frustrating, and sets limitations that for one reason or another you might want to circumvent in one specific case or another. Mostly, those are bad ideas, but it does limit your ability to fly to different places sometimes.
As a user/passenger of private luxury aviation, this sometimes makes for considerable frustration and people are always trying to talk their pilots into doing stupid things like overloading their aircraft, not requiring people to stay in the seats where the wieght and balance of the aircraft is safe, flying into airports below weather minimums, things in general that are somewhat likely to get you killed.
Pilots often deflect judgment on this by saying “it’s FAA regulations” so they don’t seem like “the bad guy”. Ultimately, in many cases, the relationship of the pilot to the client is a lot like a waiter in food service.
Consequently, many wealthy private flying people that are used to getting whatever they want in life end up feeling like the FAA is this overbearing, freedom hating bureaucracy that enforces ridiculous rules for specious reasons and makes their lives more difficult for no reason.
This impression may be true in very narrow cases with very specific individual FAA employees, just like with some traffic cops. But by and large, the FAA, when left to its own devices, does an admirable job of keeping people safe and alive despite some very vexing physics, as well as human nature, colluding to make that improbable… while facilitating the safe travels of millions of passengers per day.
Also, the FAA sometimes makes life a little harder for musk because they don’t want metal falling out of the sky on peoples heads around launch sites.
I believe this is behind the hate. It’s spite.
Kobe Bryant's pilot had to get special permission to fly that day [0].
Too bad it was granted. If he'd been grounded for the fog, all nine people would have missed their morning's scheduled events but would still be alive.
All take-offs are optional; landings are not optional.
[0] https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/28/us/kobe-bryant-crash-timeline...
You’re usually required to be hundreds or thousands of feet from clouds; SVFR trims that down to “don’t touch them”. Going into the clouds was still illegal.
CNN framing it as “special permission” is… kinda true, but misleading in sentiment. I don’t think I’ve ever heard a controller turn down SVFR.
SVFR cannot be solicited by the controller (same with cancelling IFR).
I did have to turn down the SVFR request initially though, because it is a lower priority than IFR traffic, but once the IFR traffic was clear, I gave the SVFR clearance.
FAA Order 7110.65 section 7-5-3
There are notes here:
https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/atc_html...
On the other hand, the Federal Aviation Regulations are vast and detailed, and as pilots, we are forced to become mini-lawyers as a side job so that we can know and understand them all. Go to any online pilot forum, and half the posts are pilots quoting 14 CFR at each other and micro-analyzing each word from the holy text.
1: https://www.faasafety.gov/gslac/ALC/course_content.aspx?cID=...
DEI is a boogeyman for the aviation industry, and I remember back before 2010 the CEO of Sabre constantly harping on the neglect in the aviation infrastructure (spending to modernize) that would’ve alleviated the issues we’re facing today. The deregulated US airlines have had zero accountability to pay into a public utility they rely upon. Numerous administrations of both sides have passed the buck…it’s the Baby Boomer way…that and destroying pensions!
DEI didn’t dump airline pensions on the PBGC, get your head out of your asses with that ish.
Source: aviation family and witnessed several decades of this industry getting to where it is today
More staff would mean less traffic per controller.
Understaffing allowed the hiring issues in question, to have a larger impact.
A lot of the current problems are consequences of Reagan's mass firing.
Opinions are my own do not necessarily reflect those of the FAA.
Most of everyone who was hired to replace all of those fired controllers are now retiring or have retired within the past few years which has impacted the understaffing we are now facing.
Because of the surge of controllers leaving the workforce (being fired), there was a surge of controllers to replace them, and now there is a surge of controllers retiring.
If I had to guess, most controllers retire between ages 50-56: from when most are eligible (annecdotal to people I've asked), to when forced out by age limit. So not slowly spread out over time as to allow for a more gradual replacement.
If you take a steady state and make a drastic change, it's not going to correct itself instantly.
Citation needed.
Fascinating, because the FAA has one of the largest scale DEI programs that limited hiring of qualified individuals. I think this criticism is completely valid.
>Taking old, resolved scandals - slapping a coat of culture war paint on it - and then selling it as a new scandal is already a popular MO for state-sponsored propoganda, so we should be extra wary of stories like this being massaged.
I think legitster is right here.
"The article actually shows that dei considerations were central to the original changes, not just recent framing."
User "legitster" is not very legit. They wrote nonsense including something about a "secret racial kabal" elsewhere that I took apart and they didn't have any reaponse to because they were so wrong.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42936278
Opinions are my own and not necessarily that of the FAA.
>Congress stopped the shitty behavior quiz 9 years ago
Your attempts to discredit someone you clearly have beef with have fallen flat. Have a good one.
I also hope you learn that in ATC, hiring (and firing) practices can have a long, very long, lasting effect.
Opinions are my own and not necessarily that of the FAA. (I'm an Air Traffic Contoller and I'm required to say something to that effect. I also was not directly affected by that quiz, but the quiz had effects which impacted the NAS (National Airspace System) which indirectly impacts me.)
Do you think that's unique to ATC?
In other professional jobs, people generally aren't forced out at a certain age, so that's fairly unique to FAA ATC and adds the dynamic that I mentioned in another comment in this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43356217
Did you know there are jobs other than McDonald’s and ATC?
It seems like you're unable to engage in a meaningful conversation on this. Have a nice weekend.
Both a troll and an actually-serious person would say the same thing.
> Have a nice weekend.
You too. I wish you the best (which means moving past the infantile desire to troll, edit: and calling other people assholes in other comment threads)
They want segregation again and this is their most sympathetic case for it. One that journalists and HN commenters are happy to "steelman" into a policy that sounds like it makes sense even though it does not.