Duterte's ICC arrest is a victory for a faltering rules-based order
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
Brazil's ex-military still not in prison e.g. And all the US presidents or CIA leaders roaming free. Certainly not a victory.
Our refusal to coöperate with the ICC doesn’t undermine the rules-based international order, which is first and foremost based on a notion of state sovereignty. It undermines the international human rights project (that admittedly seems to be dead).
The original sin was NATO—a defensive alliance—bombing Yugoslavia. Iraq was just a WTF cherry on top. That said, we didn’t annex anything, which the norm Russia toppled in Ukraine. Though now Trump and his supporters appear keen to make Iraq look milquetoast.
It reduces the number of dead going forward by lowering the upside from wars of conquest.
Eastern Europe is now part of NATO. /s
Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.
In a war no one would think twice.
Hopefully the ICC is defunded soon, Duterte might have not been right, maybe the right thing was to allow the killing ( and rapes and violent crimes ) to continue and slowly try and stop it against the will of the people. Morally maybe it's better to let thousands of innocents die.
The international community should not have been involved. It's corruption from opposition parties here. It seems most international organisations have become bureaucratic and corrupt tools for external groups.
It was a horrible time in the Philippines and even worse, you can draw a LOT of parallels between his campaign and time in office to Trumps. Both used Cambridge Analytica data to manipulate voters on social media (and traditional media) and had "troll armies" on social media, both ran on populist/disestablishment platforms, both very "macho" and Duterte said horrible stuff that his press secretary pawned off as "Bisaya humor", where Trump did the same thing and pawned it off as "locker room talk". Trump cozies up to Putin just like Duterte cozied up to Xi Jinping even as he was encroaching in the West Philippine Sea. Duterte had his "oplan tokhong" targeting drug users (he said they were raping babies), where Trump has his ICE people going after brown people (he said they're eating peoples dogs). Both also wanted to alter their constitutions to allow longer terms for themselves.
If you put your tinfoil hat on for a moment, you could probably make a convincing argument that Duterte's presidency was like a pilot program for Trump's.
- "Additionally, polling firm PUBLiCUS Asia reported in Duterte's last month in office that Duterte received a 75% approval for his entire six-year tenure, making him the most popular post-EDSA president"
- The murder rate halved under his administration: https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/PHL/phi...
I am completely against killing people without due process, as he did, and bragged about. But it does seem that most people in the Philippines were happy with his policies, and his policies do appear to be "effective" wrt murder, though are extrajudicial killings by police any better? I don't think so
Also note that his term was 2016-2022 and from 2017-2019 the Philippines was under martial law[1] and 2020-2022 (Covid time) everyone was on another mandatory lockdown[2]. In addition to this, crime was already dropping before his term, and his statistics are dubious[3]
[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proclamation_No._216 [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_community_quarantines... [3]: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/philippi...