> What enabled this remote disabling was a practice known as “VIN-locking,” which manufacturers use to prevent unauthorized repairs to their products ... When it suits their purposes, then, the technology exists for heavy machinery companies to monitor, control and even disable products. Human rights abuses against Palestinians and Indians apparently don’t rise to the level of violating company values, let alone cause enough concern for the company to brick their machines
You can imagine more complicated safeguards if you like, but there's a simple solution sitting and waiting right there. All that's requires is for Caterpillar to decide they have any principles other than money...
> In 2017, an investigation by The Guardian and The Bureau of Investigative Journalism revealed that after the conclusion of the Corrie case, Caterpillar hired the corporate espionage company C2i* to spy on the family and report back on any subsequent actions they might be planning.
... Not fucking likely though.
* Think this was actually the Increment Group, Intelligence Company. C2i were in the same investigation for spying on environmental 'activists'.
Hypothetically - if you learned that your product was being used to run over people "dead and alive, in the hundreds", so that "everything squirts out", would you shrug and fob off responsibility? Even when you already had the technology to shut down those machines installed, and major human rights orgs are warning of genocide?
... Or would you just argue that your machines shouldn't have had that capability in the first place? ... Do you see how far that's missing the point?
Tbh even that would be better than Caterpillar's likely response, which was probably to try and book even more sales based on the 'success' of their machinery and the pending reconstruction.
Really, we should just cut to the chase and outlaw murder.
For example, I'd observe that organized crime pretty much everywhere in the world possesses weapons. The extent to which they resort to them varies of course, but it seems unreasonable to blindly dismiss that as being due entirely to regulation.
Here is a very coarse overview of what I would term "problem". It's the list of countries by firearm related homicide rates https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-r...
Sorting the second table (Homicide rates by firearm per 100,000 inhabitants. Latest available year.) by rate is rather eye-opening.
The USA is four times as high as Canada - and almost forty times as high as Australia
Jamaica * 44.706 2022
Saint Lucia * 30.580 2022
Honduras * 28.721 2021
Bahamas 28.538 2022
Saint Kitts and Nevis * 25.207 2021
Ecuador * 22.565 2022
Belize * 22.454 2022
Trinidad and Tobago * 20.551 2020
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 20.128 2021
Puerto Rico * 18.382 2016
Colombia * 18.127 2022
Mexico * 17.497 2022
Brazil * 15.945 2020
Barbados 11.717 2022
Panama * 10.227 2021
Antigua and Barbuda * 8.532 2022
Costa Rica * 8.304 2021
Uruguay 6.807 2022
Dominican Republic * 6.724 2022
Paraguay * 4.803 2021
El Salvador * 4.782 2022
Bermuda 4.674 2021
United States * 4.054 2020
Chile * 3.637 2022
Guatemala * 3.436 2021
Suriname * 3.398 2022
Guyana * 2.983 2021
Peru * 2.937 2020
Argentina * 2.305 2022
Egypt * 2.062 2011
Nicaragua 2.000 2021