Hacker News Reader

Comment by more_corn | Hacker News Reader

This is great to hear. I good use of AI if the false positives can be controlled.

False positives don't seem overly harmful here either, since the main use would be bringing it to human attention for further thought

Is there advantage over just reviewing papers with a critical eye?

If reviewer effort is limited and the model has at least a bias in the right direction.

So I just need to make sure my fraud goes under the radar of these AI tools, and then the limited reviewer effort will be spent elsewhere.

I think some people will find an advantage in flagging untold numbers of research papers as frivolous or fraudulent with minimal effort, while putting the burden of re-proving the work on everyone else.

In other words, I fear this is a leap in Gish Gallop technology.

There's probably 10 X more problematic academic publications, than currently get flagged. Automating the search for the likeliest candidates is going to be very helpful by focusing the "critical eye" where it can make the biggest difference.

The largest problems with most publications (in epi and in my opinion at least) is study design. Unfortunately, faulty study design or things like data cleaning is qualitative, nuanced, and difficult to catch with AI unless it has access to the source data.

Hopefully, one would use this to try to find errors in a massive number of papers, and then go through the effort of reviewing these papers themselves before bringing up the issue. It makes no sense to put effort unto others just because the AI said so.

Walking through their interface, it seems like when you click though on the relatively few that aren't just tiny spelling/formatting errors,

Like this style:

> Methodology check: The paper lacks a quantitative evaluation or comparison to ground truth data, relying on a purely qu...

They always seem to be edited to be simple formatting errors.

https://yesnoerror.com/doc/eb99aec0-a72a-45f7-bf2c-8cf2cbab1...

If they can't improve that the signal to noise ratio will be to high and people will shut it off/ignore it.

Time is not free, cost people lots of time without them seeing value and almost any project will fail.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com