They can't be MITMing people left and right without getting caught. Maybe getting caught is not a problem, but still. And if you use query name minimization[0] then it gets harder for the root CA and any intermediates but the last one to decide whether to MITM you. And you can run your own root for your network.

[0] QName minimization means if if you're asking for foo.bar.baz.example. you'll ask . for example. then you'll ask example. for baz.example. and so on, detecting all the zone cuts yourself. As opposed to sending the full foo.bar.baz.example. query to . then example. and so on. If you minimize the query then . doesn't get to know anything other than the TLD you're interested in, which is not much of a clue as to whether an evil . should MITM you. Now because most domainnames of interest have only one or two intermediate zones (a TLD or a ccTLD and one below that), and because those intermediates are also run by parties similar to the one that runs the root, you might still fear MITMing.

But you can still use a combination of WebPKI and DANE, in which case the evil DNSSEC CAs would have to collaborate with some evil WebPKI CA.

Ultimately though DNSSEC could use having CT.