Hacker News Reader

> If that basic thing talks like a human, why would be a human be something different?

Because properly intelligent humans actually think instead of being thinking simulators, as is apparent from the quality of the LLM outputs.

> parrot ... like this alone makes it unimpressive

"What could possibly go wrong".

And you have any argument at all?

After all the output of these LLMs is often significant better than what a lot of humans are capable

> And you have any argument at all?

To state what exactly?

> than what a lot of humans are capable

And what is that supposed to imply?

I suggest you read the exchange with member A_D_E_P_T just parallel, there are reasons to think it contains the requested replies.