I think it can help a lot under the right circumstances, but if the system is already overwhelmed then funding less permanent solutions for a while may actually be more effective and kind
I think it can help a lot under the right circumstances, but if the system is already overwhelmed then funding less permanent solutions for a while may actually be more effective and kind
I remember reading an article in Portland that the city was expecting N new people to move there in the next 10 years. So they approved construction of housing for N-200k people.
They intentionally set things up to push the poorest and most vulnerable 200k people into homelessness.
1. We'd need to pay 5k get a price estimate for all of the permits we would need, and
2. That we would need to either pave a road along the property (which would immediately fall apart from erosion since it would be the only paved road for multiple blocks), or pay $400k for the right to not pave the road
At that point, we stopped even trying. There's no way to build affordable housing in a timeline manner in that city.