https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/a-timeline-of-cultlike-z...
https://www.mercurynews.com/2025/02/15/northern-california-z...
That said, this stylistic choice works for computer security related things (e.g. the spy genre of news). It feels like a waste of time everywhere else.
"Years before she became the peculiar central thread linking a double homicide in Pennsylvania, the fatal shooting of a federal agent in Vermont and the murder of an elderly landlord in California, a computer programmer bought a sailboat."
I wanted to keep reading, so I guess I was their audience - not everything has to be up to your personal standards to be worth while.
As parent mentioned. You do have a choice not to read novels, or to read novels. That doesn't make a novel bad because it is a novel.
Perhaps AI could help here by rewriting the article into the format it should have used, but then you risk hallucinations.
Thankfully, there's a variety of writing styles, so that every one of us can find something we enjoy reading and skip the stuff we don't enjoy.
I don't see why you should be the sole arbiter of what writing style is allowed.
In short, you appear to only be familiar with the mandated style for factual news-reporting - not for other journalistic output - and seem to think all deviation is in error.
Here's an example from one of the kings of the form - Michael Lewis - and his award-winning piece of financial journalism regarding the Greek bond crisis that nearly brought down the Euro:
https://archive.vanityfair.com/article/2010/10/beware-of-gre...