Literally these are the only three sources I can find of people claiming this:
1. https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/s9b2eg/brother_mf...
2. https://github.com/sedrubal/brother_printer_fwupd/issues/9
Literally these are the only three sources I can find of people claiming this:
1. https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/s9b2eg/brother_mf...
2. https://github.com/sedrubal/brother_printer_fwupd/issues/9
That was the last Brother color printer I'll buy, unless they go back to accepting generic toner.
https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/qcstzv/downgrade_... (in German)
https://github.com/CauldronDevelopmentLLC/oh-brother/issues/...
https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/w60687/comment/ih...
https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/w9bc3g/downdgradi...
What are the alternatives then? Brother is often cited as the brand that is the most tolerant of generic consumables and with the least anti-consumer practices. But now that even Brother plays this game...
Swapping the drm chip from the oem starter cartridge to my 3rd party cartridge resolved the othe problem
I also have HL-3230CDW that I bought few years ago and aftermarket toner works fine.
Seems like they must have done it to the newer printers.
The new printer is completely uneconomical. I had to pay around £150 for Brother set of toners, whereas aftermarket for my older printer is just £35. The quality is the same.
Anyway, it's definitely possible that these newer issues are Brother doing something nefarious, but I could also see a lot of these issues being with finicky sensors.
So ... not HP, not Brother ... anyone left that sells reasonable printers with honest firmware?