One Space or Two? When did this change?
chicagomanualofstyle.org
chicagomanualofstyle.org
After spending hours writing, proofing, spell checking, and character couting the essays, my wife tried to copy/paste them into the online form. No dice - over the character limit. She called me in to help. I tried Word => SciTE => form, Word => Notepad => form, and a few others. Nothing worked.
Finally, I pulled up Firebug and did a little digging. Turns out this application was using a rich text editor that was converting any two spaces to a space + thus counting two spaces as 7 characters.
Needless to say, I did a find/replace for two spaces to one space and her application went through fine. We haven't used two spaces since.
This was my first thought as well, but why? A monospaced space is larger than a proportional space, so if you used two monospaced spaces, maybe now you should use three proportional spaces. Instead the space between sentences has gotten much smaller.
1. Two full spaces, especially with monospaced fonts, is entirely too much, and hurts legibility. When I say "a little extra space," I really do mean "a little."
2. It is the job of the typesetting or layout system or engine to properly render sentences. A typist should focus on writing, on expressing thoughts as well and as clearly as possible, not on dealing with layout or font kerning bullshit.
For example, TeX, a layout engine which produces very good-looking results, adds a little extra space after a period (full stop) TeX just cares about whitespace, but does not count how many occurred (an exception: one or more blank lines introduce a new paragraph). It understands the page being laid out, and it understands the font, so it just adds the appropriate amount of space where needed, without any extra effort from the typist. TeX also happens to correctly handle inter-line hyphenation, which typists have no business worrying about, either. The same applies for first-sentence-in-paragraph indentation. Honestly, if a layout "engine" is called MS Word, or some other WYSLLTS (What You See Looks Like Total Shit) fancy word processor, and does not appropriately lay out documents, then that "engine" is a piece of junk. Failing that, type however many spaces you want and hire an InDesign or Quark Express expert to make sure everything looks as it should.
I suppose things might have changed since I learned touch typing on my Dad's Compaq Chameleon: http://www.ubertechworld.com/museum/images/Compaq_PortableI/...
Two spaces emerged as a convention for reasons mentioned in other posts here, and typing teachers in particular seem to have jumped on that bandwagon. However, the effect on rendered type is that it leaves unpleasant gaps in paragraphs in most popular programs (Word, etc.), and so the correct form according to typography professionals is apparently one space (or slightly more, but then that becomes a rendering issue, not one for the typist to decide). Since I have a huge appreciation for typography (albeit, not enough knowledge of the art itself), I feel it's worth correcting my habit.
Go figure...
(setq sentence-end-double-space nil) (setq sentence-end "[.?!][]\"')]\\($\\|\t\\| \\)[ \t\n]")
;Sets sentence end to be .?!, but with 1-space after sentence terminator rather than 2.
;I have no idea why 2 spaces is the default.
(setq sentence-end "[.?!][]\"')}]*\\($\\| $\\| \\| \\)[ ]*") (setq sentence-end-double-space nil)
in your .emacs. Its a variable used for filling defined in paragraphs.el.Word, we're all looking at you.
Yup.
As for the rest, yeah, two spaces. A period's often a single pixel with 4-8 grey antialiased dots around it.