For instance it is trivial for a country to reduce crime statistics simply by making things that used to be crimes legal
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1477370818794124?ic...
What's the point of reporting it if you know that nothing will come out of it? I had my car broken into, my phone stolen on the train, I have been harassed on public transport. Guess how many times the perpetrators were fined/convicted?
A big fat 0. And some of that stuff happened in areas with multiple "security" cameras who witnessed the whole thing.
Comparatively they are still incredibly safe countries, and the sentiment of insecurity has always been disproportionate to reality and politically exploited.
But people feeling the social climate deteriorating is also spot on, the economy not doing great and rising inequalities is largely part of it so I don't think it will improve in the short term.
In 2005 France's domestic intelligence network, the Renseignements Generaux, identified 150 "no-go zones" around the country where police would not enter without reinforcements.
I am guessing, the sentiment of insecurity must be pretty strong in these areas if the cops don't even go there anymore.
Slightly off-topic, but there are areas where cops are more in danger than the general public (visceral ACAB sentiment), and people from the higher spheres of society also won't set a foot there. These places will fit both profiles of "no-law" zone and being extremely peaceful and easy to live in.
[0] https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89meutes_dans_les_banlieue...
Also, the way of counting has been manipulated in Spain at least to mask the data conveniently.