While it is true, that the US delivered more weapons, they are far behind in terms of financial support and humanitarian aid.

So in total the US falls behind. It is also important to note, that about 70% of the aid by the US flow back to the US weapons manufacturers.

While Donald Trump demands 500 billion dollars in minerals from Ukraine for further support, their contribution so far is less than 120 billion dollars.

I think sometimes in the US we forget we’re not the world police, and this is supposed to be a team effort

And it's such old old stock. Such as the m1a1 tanks we gave them. This is a 1970's design we made up until 1992. The US would never field such ancient tanks ourselves, not without massive overhaul & refurbishment. They also drink fuel like crazy & have demanding-to-maintain old old old gas turbine engines.

We've shipped countless pallets of ammo that is either expiring or expired. We gave them the ancient old stock of 1980's ATACMS that were rotting in place.

Yet we keep saying we give them $X dollars of aid. As if this ancient surplus equipment is as valuable today as what we paid for two three or four decades ago. Equipment we had just lying around, that we were going to have to dispose of somehow, at significant cost to us.

Leaving that aside shouldn’t Europe be donating (not loaning) many times more than the US? Why draw a comparison at all, as if the two should be equal?